1 The Muppet Mindset: Muppet King Arthur
Showing posts with label Muppet King Arthur. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Muppet King Arthur. Show all posts

May 10, 2010

Muppet Comic Mondays: Muppet King Arthur #4


Muppet King Arthur #4
Comic Book Review
Written by Paul Benjamin and Patrick Storck
Illustrated by James Silvani



James Gannon - So it comes to pass that another “Muppet Classics” side series comic arc has come to an end. This was the third in a series of retellings after Muppet Robin Hood and Muppet Peter Pan, leaving the way for Muppet Snow White.  So how does this one stack up against the others? All in good time. First we gotta see what’s in issue 4.

As I said last time, if you have the basic understanding of the Arthurian Legend you know that Robin’s casting of Mordred was something rather interesting. Sure, Mordred was also King Arthur’s nephew, so on that sense it’s a no brainer. Of course, Mordred also betrays Arthur. And Betray Arthur is exactly what Robin does here. It’s handled perfectly in character, though, with Robin being annoyed at his uncle’s over protectiveness, and clearly being a pawn of Sir Sam (the Eagle), who, as we’ve seen in the last 3 issues, doesn’t like that Kermit’s the king all that much. Of course, Arthur Kermit has to challenge Mordred Robin for ownership of the thrown of England. And while both covers hint at mortal combat between the two, somehow Kermit fighting Robin to the death doesn’t exactly seem Muppety at all.  Instead we get a more fitting approach between the two… a pun-off, refereed by Fozzie. And while I just can’t give everything away, the ending is so perfectly Kermit. Come on. You were expecting Le Morte De Kermit? All loose ends get tied up, even ends you didn’t realize.

Now, as this was the final issue, an overall critique is in order, and it needs to be compared full with the other two Muppet Classics comics. Muppet Robin Hood, while I felt the writing was good, tried to cram too much of the big honkin’ legend into a four-issue semi-parody retelling. As such, there was a LOT of dialogue that made for speech balloons that were bigger than the art at some points, detracting a lot from the action. It really couldn’t find the balance of source material and Muppetness that it could have had. Thankfully, Muppet Peter Pan was much better. It stuck to important parts of the story, trimming away the Mermaids and Indians (which I kinda thought the Mayhem was). It also removed the crocodile completely, which wouldn’t have worked with the sympathetic version of Hook. All the while the story managed to really incorporate a lot of Muppet wackiness with some great sweetness of the story. It was a coming of age tale that turned a younger, more immature Peter Pan into the Kermit the Frog we all know.

Muppet King Arthur is different. It took the main iconic bullet points from the Arthurian legend (which itself is inconsistent and at the hands of many authors over the years) and said to itself, we have Excalibur, Morgan le Fey, the Holy Grail… let’s run with it. That freed up a lot of wiggle room to make sure the writers and artists had fun and kept the insane Muppet spirit perfectly intact. Not to mention the fact that it fit perfectly into a four-issue arc without any gaps or overlaps. I wish the Muppet movie adaptations of classic stories were this much fun. There’s a real consistency with running gags in this series. Throughout, you’ll find Rizzo holding or selling signs. Even minor cameos from earlier issues come back for the final panel. Stuff you’d even think were throwaway gags eventually come back. The only exception is that the first issue seemed to hint at Lew Zealand being one of the knights, but I suspect that was a red herring. The character voices were spot on throughout. Kermit seemed perfectly himself, especially at the end. And Pepe was written and drawn flawlessly here--even Muppet Peter Pan didn’t get him that accurate

I will say that I’m conflicted about both artists. Part of me wishes Dave Alvarez did the whole thing, another part wishes it was all James Silvani. They both did such marvelous work that really fit with the humor and writing style Paul Benjamin and Patrick Storck were going for.

If you missed the entire series up to this point, go back and get them, or at least wait for the graphic novel reprints. This is one Muppet Comics side arc that you shouldn’t miss!














The Muppet Mindset by Ryan Dosier

Mar 22, 2010

Muppet Comic Mondays: Muppet King Arthur #3


Muppet King Arthur #3 
Comic Book Review


James Gannon -  Since we’ve come to the penultimate issue of Muppet King Arthur, it’s impossible to do any parody of the legend without referencing the quest for the Holy Grail at some point.  It was the best remembered of the Monty Python movies after all (there’s just NO love for “Meaning of Life”).  Disgusted that the Octagonal Table hasn’t become the symbol of justice and equal rule in England, and is in fact used as ONLY a dinner table, King Arthur (Kermit, if you haven’t read a single issue or review by now) begs for a challenge  to show off the knights’ valor.  Enter Arthur’s nephew Mordread, played by Robin.  If you have a basic understanding of Arthurian legend, or have seen the “Sir Gyro DeGearloose” episode of Ducktales, you know why that’s strange.  If not, I’m not giving anything else away.  He, of course, suggests that they go off and find the grail, while Kermit thanks him by making him stay behind.  You know, the old, “you’re too young and small, and I don’t trust that you’ll be safe,” bit.   And directionlessly, they wander off.

Meanwhile, after a misunderstanding between Kermit and Piggy (Morgana), the sorceress swine is lead to think that King Arthur will marry Gwenevire (Camilla).  After all, Holy Grail sounds like Holy Veil… if you have mud in your ears and mishear anything but “ail.”  It gives us a nice break of the story for a Piggy being Piggy moment that throws the knights off their trail.  The quest leads the crew on a long chase, starting at the East bat Auction House (where it’s promptly out of stock- it sold JUST before they got there).  On the way, of course, there are running gags (which pay off wonderfully at the end) and the same assortment of current jokes that actually work (sorry, Muppet Wizard of Oz).  And thankfully we aren’t bombarded with obvious references to the Monty Python movie here (there was in the first issue, and it was executed very cleverly).  This issue really ramps up on the action.  And it should, since the next issue is the conclusion.  The first 2 issues of this series established the characters through a series of gags, so thankfully that’s out of the way.  And it seems to have a good flow so far.  This issue ends with the promise of a thrill a minute finale.

All and all, my only gripe is the coloring in this series just comes out too dark when printed on the newsprint stock they switched to a while back.  If it’s not the intention of the artists, it’s clearly a translation of the ink on the stock.  It’s such a shame, since it should give it a very bold comic book quality. At least it doesn’t look as muddy as some of Muppet Robin hood did. 

Now, normally, I don’t give things away, so if you didn’t read the issue by now, or don’t want spoilers in any way, stop reading here.

The Holy Grail is eventually sold to (cringe worthy pun) Pepe, the Fisher King Prawn.  The only reason why I’m bringing this up is because Pepe is drawn and written perfectly right here.  Pepe is a very hard Muppet to look right in illustration \and he isn’t all that easy to write for.  While I liked Amy’s Muppet Babies-like version of him in Muppet Peter Pan (an unfortunate side effect of not having any good references, she once said) I don’t think he was really handled quite as good as he is here.  And it feels like he was just thrown into Muppet Robin Hood, where he looked meh and none of his dialogue really seemed to be pure Pepe.  The Muppet Show Comic Book focuses only on classic Muppet Show characters, so the Fairy Tale series is the only place where you really get to see the newer Muppets Tonight and Jim Henson Hour characters shine.














The Muppet Mindset by Ryan Dosier

Mar 2, 2010

Interview with Muppet King Arthur Artist James Silvani



I had the privilege of interviewing James Silvani, an extremely talented artist who has taken over illustrating duties for the rest of the run of Muppet King Arthur. James has also worked on BOOM!'s Pixar comics and has done promotional drawings for the Looney Tunes, Animaniacs, and more! So kick back, relax, and join me as we get to know James Silvani!

James Silvani Interview

RYAN:   First and foremost, James, thank you so very much for agreeing to an interview with me. Before we get started do you have anything you’d like to say to The Muppet Mindset readers?

JAMES:   “Hi-Ho”

RYAN:   How did you get started with BOOM! Studios and the Muppet comic books?

JAMES:   Boom! Studios has a board set up where artists looking for work can post samples. Of course I was thinking “Yeah, right. Like they ever check that stuff.” But as a lifelong Muppet fan who thought there might be the slimmest chance to draw the objects of my obsession, I gave it a shot. I whipped up a quick strip starring Lew Zealand and posted it. So I guess in a sea of superhero claptrap, my Muppet samples (which can be seen on my blog) stood out like a sore thumb. The fabulous and quick thinking Amy Mebberson saw my post and forwarded it on to Boom! editor Aaron Sparrow and after an okay from the powers-that-be at Disney, I was offered work that week.

RYAN:   Now, of course, you’ve drawn the interior artwork for “Muppet King Arthur” 2, 3, and 4. How did that job come about?

JAMES:   Although my first jobs for Boom! were a couple of covers for the Pixar properties, my discussions with the editor were always about the Muppets. When Muppet King Arthur fell behind schedule I was asked to fill in on the second issue. I guess the fact that I turned the issue over in under 12 hours and completely free of charge endeared me to the editor and he kept me on to finish the series. True story! Except for the 12 hours and free part.

RYAN:   What were the most challenging aspects of drawing the Muppets in the middle ages?

JAMES:   Probably learning to use a quill on parchment by candle light.

RYAN:   Who is your favorite Muppet character to draw?

JAMES:   I think Dr. Teeth is the most fun but probably one of the hardest. There are so many aspects to him that catch you off guard. He has this huge nose, a massive jaw to hold all those teeth and those glasses/visor things that people seem to mistake as eyelids all on a small green head. But I think all those things come together nicely to make him the most expressive Muppet. I’m anxious to show readers how he shows up in issue #3

RYAN:   Were any characters more difficult to draw than others?

JAMES:   It’s funny, EVERYBODY was difficult to draw at first. I look at the art in the front of the book compared to the art at the end of the book and I saw that I had a pretty rocky start. It was a matter of finding my own voice for the book. What’s so great about Boom! handling the Muppets is there’s room for Amy Mebberson’s spot-on interpretations of the puppets and Roger Langridge’s alternative lunacy. I don’t think I had that clear vision when I first started.  I wanted to give the characters that recognizable “puppety” look , but have them move and express themselves in a way only a comic book character could. That being said I think Fozzie and Piggy were the hardest to really nail down. Damn you Frank Oz.

RYAN:
   When drawing a comic, how much decision do you have in which characters appear in the background of the story and how much does the writer dictate?

JAMES:   I think unless it was specified that a character had a speaking part, they were fair game for backgrounds, so I guess it was up to me. Luckily (?) most of issue 2 was crowd scenes so I got to a point where I was running out of obscure characters and whatnots to draw. Thank God for the penguins- good Muppet crowd fillers and comedy gold. I tried to put in so many characters for some of the crowd scenes that the colorist has been driving by and egging my house.

RYAN:   In the case of Muppet King Arthur, there are two writers. How does that differ from working with a single writer?

JAMES:   Most of the dealing I had with the script went to (editor) Aaron Sparrow. But if I did have a question about specifics I went to Paul Benjamin. He seemed to be in charge of the artistic notes on the script. We just kind of group emailed and agreed on everything

RYAN:   Who are some of your favorite Muppets?

JAMES:   I’ve always been a fan of the Electric Mayhem as a whole. I think I lobbied for them to play at my prom. But it was Lew Zealand that taught me about artistic integrity, persevering against adversity and fashion.

RYAN:   What about your favorite Muppet production?

JAMES:   Growing up, I pretty much planned my life around The Muppet Show. You can make new Muppet movies but nothing will ever equal that little half hour of joy I experienced every week.

RYAN:   Aside from the Muppets, you’ve also worked with a bunch of other classic character groups such as the Looney Tunes, Animaniacs, and the Disney family of characters. Can you talk to us a little bit about your work with these properties?

JAMES:   I got my start right out of college drawing t-shirt designs for the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. From there I discovered I kind of had a knack for licensed characters. After that I went to work for Mattel’s advertising firm where I picked up the Disney characters and after I went freelance I was able to do a lot of work for Warner Bros. merchandising. I probably just should have pursued an animation career but I’m too lazy.

RYAN:   When approached by BOOM! to do covers for Muppet comics that you aren’t doing interior art for (such as Muppet Snow White), how much do you get to dictate what you draw?

JAMES:   I don’t even think there was a finished script at the time I did the Snow White cover. The editor just had the title (which at the time was “Snow White & the Electric Mayhem”). Otherwise the editor will usually give me the story in a roundabout way and I have pretty much free reign from there. I will usually provide a couple of sketches first to make sure I’m not giving anything away from a later part of the story. Of course when you’re dealing with a look for Snow White the only real recognizable reference place to go to is, well, Disney. Let’s hear it for synergy!

RYAN:
   What do you use as references when you draw the Muppets?

JAMES:   As much video as I can track down. I’ve got all The Muppet Show DVDs and a few of the movies. Of course if someone would like to donate a set of those excellent Muppet action figures from Palisades toys to further the cause...

RYAN:   How much leeway did you have when drawing the costumes in Muppet King Arthur?

JAMES:   Actually I tried to keep to what Dave Alvarez had started as close as I could. I knew that the change in our styles would be jarring enough to the readers, so I didn’t vary from his designs too much. Otherwise I tried my best to keep to the sensibilities that have been established in the Arthur interpretations that most people know. “Excalibur”, “The Sword in the Stone” (sorry all you “First Knight” fans).

RYAN:   What chance do Muppet fans have of seeing Angus McGonagle the Gargling Gargoyle in the story?

JAMES:   We’ve been in contact with Mr. McGonagle’s people. At this time he’s still holding out for script approval.

RYAN:
   When working on the story, how much does the comic book artist decide the “camera angle,” so to speak, of the frame? Or is that mostly handled by the writer(s)?

JAMES:   The writer will give the setting but it’s pretty much my discretion on how to present the view. Of course I’m so used to seeing the Muppets only from the waist up it’s hard not to get drawn in to that kind of visualizing for a scene.

RYAN:   What advice can you offer to budding fan artists wanting to get involved with the Muppet comics?

JAMES:   Wait until I retire.

Actually, my best advice, especially with the Muppets, is find your own style. What makes the Muppets so unique and so much fun to work on, as opposed to other licensed properties, is that there is no set style in place. Look at how Roger Langridge has totally captured the feel of the show yet retained his own artistic sensibilities.

Also when you are submitting art, really concentrate on telling a story with just your pictures. My samples told a gag from point A to point B without a single word. If you can do that, you’ll go far in this business.

RYAN:   What can fans of your work expect to see from you beyond Muppet King Arthur? Do you plan to do any more work with the Muppets?

JAMES:   I have a SUPER secret project that I am working on for Boom! that will be announced at the end of March. After that wraps I hope to return to the Muppets. It’s so much fun as a grown up to be drawing the things that I drew as a kid. The only thing that would be cooler is to draw the Muppets, Batman and the Star Wars characters teaming up to fight Godzilla (Come on Aaron Sparrow, make it happen!)

RYAN:   Where can fans find more of your artwork?

JAMES:   My portfolio site is www.silvaniart.com which has a link to my blog at silvaniart.blogspot.com. I update the blog a few times a month. Otherwise take a close look at the cereal aisle or the boys t-shirt department. I illustrate a lot of items there as well.

RYAN:   James, thank you again so much for agreeing to this interview with The Muppet Mindset. Any final thoughts before we conclude?


How cool is THAT, huh? James drew that final image specifically for this interview and I can't thank him enough! I hope you all enjoyed this interview with James Silvani. Be sure to check out the rest of his work at www.silvaniart.com and silvaniart.blogspot.com. Thanks again, James!
The Muppet Mindset by Ryan Dosier

Mar 1, 2010

Muppet Comic Mondays: Muppet King Arthur #2



Muppet King Arthur #2
Comic Book Review
Written by Paul Benjamin and Peter Stork
Illustrated by James Silvani


James Gannon -
To keep things on schedule, BOOM! Studios released three Muppet comics (2 of them are King Arthur) in the frame of a month, and a short month at that. It’s like Christmas in February. Of course what would have made it more like Christmas in February is if someone bought these for me!


Now, I said in the last review they tackle this story loosely. It just got a LOT looser, and that’s not a bad thing. Unlike the other BOOM! Muppet comics, this one is full of pop culture references, anachronistic ones at that. (Think Genie from the Disney Aladdin movie. How did he know about the existence of Groucho Marx centuries before his birth?) The issue itself takes place in a parody of “Britain’s Got Talent,” going as far as making a significant parody of a famous contestant. Really, you haven’t made it until you’re a lobster caricature that the Swedish Chef tries to cook. If this was in the context of a movie, I’d actually mind all the current and semi-current references. The Muppets' Wizard of Oz came off as an advertisement for American Idol (I still blame Fox’s involvement in the project).  But this serves as a very integral plot point, being how Arthur will gather his knights of a certain table (not giving away that joke). 

And there are quite a few references to other shows, including (in a long string of gags) mentioning a certain Tatsunoko Productions anime, specifically it’s American name (Not giving away that groaner of a joke either, and I feel I should mention it, being a Tatsunoko fiend). It all comes off very much like It's a Very Merry Muppet Christmas Movie and Muppets Tonight’s best pop culture jokes only much more strategically placed. Plus, since it’s a comic book and not a movie it really doesn’t matter as much if any of the jokes are dated.

We see quite a few knight hopefuls, some with Fozzie Bear quality groan inducing names (which I shudder to even name). While King Arthur is busy with his auditioning show, Sam of Eagle hosts his own forum to disavow, discredit, and dethrone Arthur so he can take the rightful leadership spot. Of course, his bitter angry political ramblings fall on deaf ears. At the risk of sounding political, wouldn’t it be keen if things were like that in real life? And of course, we get a certain reference to a certain old skit that takes a Muppets Tonight gag to a further level.

Understandably, with scheduling and deadlines, we actually have a new artist in this issue. While I did miss Dave Alvarez’s Looney Tunes feel, James Silvani’s stark graphic quality seems to work just as well. This really bridges the gap between Muppet, cartoon, and comic with the most traditional comic book style of the group so far. The only slight issue I have were that it took a few panels to really get Fozzie and Kermit down (and once he does, he does it wonderfully). He even gives background and original characters a very Muppet feel, putting in some uncommon to rare characters in crowd scenes (I’m not revealing them). All and all, James is another great Muppet comic artist BOOM! should continue to keep an eye on for future projects.

Now, I will close this review with something that’s been bugging me since the beginning of the Muppet comics. I think the colorists do a great job and all, but sometimes it feels they’re not too familiar with certain characters, and it seems like there isn’t quite a bond between them and the artists. Basically, more than a few times I’ve noticed a wrong colored Mahna Mahna on a cover, a green Thog in the background, and in this specific comic a flesh toned Beauregard (especially after the character was colored correctly the rest of the issue) and a green haired and lipped Pepe. It’s not really all that bad, since they do a spot on job the rest of the time, and it really doesn’t detract from the overall enjoyment. But it really seems that some nice cameos get lost in the process.

Thanks to James Gannon for the fantastic review! Check back on The Muppet Mindset tomorrow for our interview with the artist of the rest of Muppet King Arthur, the fantastic James Silvani!















The Muppet Mindset by Ryan Dosier

Feb 23, 2010

Interview with Muppet King Arthur #1 Artist Dave Alvarez



Lisa Alexander - Today on The Muppet Mindset we interview artist Dave Alvarez. Dave has been involved with BOOM! Studios and the Muppet comics since the very first issue of "The Muppet Show Comic Book" when he drew a variant cover for "Kermit's Story." Most recently, Dave drew the interior artwork for Muppet King Arthur #1.

Dave Alvarez Interview

LISA:   First of all, Dave, thank you so much for taking the time to sit down with the Mindset. We really appreciate it. Do you prefer to be called Dave or David?

DAVE:   I got used to Dave. It’s different. I grew up listening to the name “David” attached to a “clean up your room!” way too many times.

LISA:   You did a beautiful variant cover for the first issue of Muppet Robin Hood. How did that come about? Did someone approach you to do it, or did you wave Semaphore flags around until someone noticed you were interested?

DAVE:   Why, thank you, I’m glad that you like it! I was “waving flags” like you said way before that to see if I could fit with their “Muppet Show” series at first.

Eventually, BOOM’s editor saw my Muppet fan-made- comic strips and asked me if I could do a variant cover for “The Muppet Show” and then they asked one for Muppet Robin Hood. 

LISA:   What about your variant covers for Kermit’s and Gonzo’s stories? How did those come about?

DAVE:   They came about the same way. Disney liked what I did for Muppet Robin Hood so they asked for variants as well. These were very limited since they were used for some specific stores but at least I got a couple of copies.

LISA:   How much did you know about the content of those issues when you did the covers? Obviously you knew Kermit and Sweetums were in Robin Hood… (Not that Kermit was much of a surprise…)

DAVE:  
BOOM sends me all kinds of visual references and the script as well. I saw one cover sample of Kermit fighting with Sweetums on a bridge and it brought my attention. So I decided to go with that.

LISA:   Now you’re doing ALL of the art for Muppet King Arthur. How is it different, from your perspective, to do the entire series, as opposed to a few covers?

DAVE:   It’s way different. I’m only in charge of pencils and inks. Colors will be provided by another artist. It’s interesting because the story demanded the intervention of many “generic” Muppets, so I made my research and drew some obscure characters from way back. Let’s see how many of them can you recognize.

LISA:   Who picks the “camera angle,” so to speak, of any given frame in the comic? Do the writers choose, or do you decide what’s in the “shot”?

DAVE:   Although the writer gives you a guideline, like for example, “establishing shot of town” or “wide shot of castle”, sometimes, one as the artist needs to modify certain angles in order for them to fit the page.

LISA:   Building off of the last question a little, how much of a say do you have in which background characters appear, for example, in a group of spectators or passers-by?

DAVE:   I got a free hand in that. Sometimes the writer wanted certain obscure characters as well. Others I just chose by my own.

LISA:   Any chance we’ll see Angus McGonagle the gargling gargoyle?

DAVE:   Aaaah, maybe! Who knows?

LISA:   King Arthur requires a lot of period clothing, even for characters who don’t usually dress at all (i.e. Kermit, Fozzie…). Kermit’s, Fozzie’s, and Gonzo’s armor all look fantastic. Do you decide what the characters wear? Or do Benjamin and Storck say, for example, “Give Kermit a red cape, and put a chicken on Gonzo’s shield”?

DAVE:   Although I also got a free ticket on some of those many of them were beautifully rendered by Amy. Some sharp-eyed readers will notice the Disney reference that I chose for Kermit’s first clothes.

LISA:   Clothing aside, there’s a huge style difference between the cover art you’ve done and the comics you’ve posted on DeviantArt and Muppet Central, and even between King Arthur and your other covers. Was that your choice, or someone else’s? Do you prefer drawing one style more than another?

DAVE:   The cover arts were done entirely by me but the interiors will be colored by another artist so you might find a slight difference in style. In the covers I combine many composition elements and was given more time.

LISA:   Speaking of your own comicswhich are hilarious , by the way—where do you find your inspiration for those? Would you ever consider writing a full story arc, if given the opportunity?

DAVE:   It’s easy once you know the characters. You just think of a situation and how the characters will react to them. I’ve been working on my daily comic strip Yenny since 2003, so it’s easy to think how Yenny or Zacha will react to certain situations.

With the Muppets is basically the same. I grew up with them so I sort of know what Kermit will say to a burned Gonzo.

LISA:   Do you look at anything as a reference when you draw the Muppets? Does what you look at vary for different styles?

DAVE:   I have a lot (if not all) of the Muppet movies, videos and books. The internet is very helpful when it comes to obscure characters. You can easily detect which Muppets have the Don Sahlin touch and which not.

LISA:   Which character, would you say, is the most difficult to draw? Which is the easiest?

DAVE:   Sweetums was the most…uhm… I won’t say difficult, but tricky. I doodled a lot first before choosing a final design. I will add myself to a list of people who say that Muppets were not meant to be drawn. That’s why I decided to go very cartoony. Just to feel as if I was making a parody of them.

LISA:   Drawing aside, who is your favorite Muppet?

DAVE:   Kermit the Frog. He always knows what to do and has the nerve to deal with millions of mentally impaired Muppets. LOL

LISA:   What’s your favorite Muppet production?

DAVE:   I would say The Muppet Movie because Jim Henson made magic when computers were not around. But somehow I love “Muppets take Manhattan” mainly because I was a small kid when it came out. I remember that my grandma used to keep all the newspaper movie reviews and pictures for me. There was even a headline that said “La Rana René por fin se Casa” which means “Kermit finally got married” and had a picture of him and Piggy in bride and groom clothes.

LISA:   You’ve done a lot of non-Muppet work, too. Tell us about some of that. What’s your favorite group of characters to draw?

DAVE:   I’ve been working in the Looney Tunes comics for 12 years now. I’ve also worked on other characters like Tomb Raider and some Paul Dini creations.  It’s difficult to say which characters are my favorite to draw. I like it when I can have a free creative input on them.

LISA:   You’re also a member of Muppet Central. What drew you into THAT insanity?

DAVE:   I don’t know. My psychiatrist says that is a good therapy. It keeps me from bungee jumping in Greek robes.

LISA:   Any suggestions for other fan artists who want to actually work for the Muppets?

DAVE:   Find your own style and show what you can do by just being yourself.

LISA:   Thanks again for taking the time to do this interview with us. Any final thoughts you’d like to share?

DAVE:   I think that’s all that we have for today so we’ll see you next time in The Muppet Show!! YAAAAAAAAAY!!!!


Thanks again to Dave Alvarez for this fantastic interview! Check out Dave's work in Muppet King Arthur #1, on shelves now!











The Muppet Mindset by Ryan Dosier

Feb 22, 2010

Muppet Comic Mondays: Muppet King Arthur #1


Muppet King Arthur #1
Comic Book Review
Written by Paul Benjamin and Peter Stork
Illustrated
by Dave Alvarez



James Gannon - After tackling Robin Hood and Peter Pan, BOOM! Comics has taken Kermit and Co. to the days of King Arthur and his well rounded night tables. Right off the bat, you can tell the tone is much different than the previous fairy tales. Pretty obvious when it starts as an infomercial, then jumps into crazy snappy word play.  Paul Benjamin and Peter Stork have decidedly taken a raucous comedy path that really showcases the off the wall wackiness of the Muppets. Kermit is cast as Arthur, and the legend starts out with him being a page (and a page worth of groan inducing “page” puns ensue). Sam, being his master, sends him out to find a new sword after a training session with Sir Perciful (Fozzie as a combination knight/ Jester, and his weapon, a large plastic chicken shaped like a baseball bat).

This leads to the chance meeting of the Lady of the Lake (Janice, fer shure), who instructs Kermit to grab the magical Excalibur (From United Kingdom, I’m looking for him… Soul Eater fans know what I’m talking about). Which leads to another Jay Wardian pun about why it’s jammed in a stone in the first place. He becomes king, as the legend goes, with extreme protest from Sam, who will clearly stop at nothing to become king himself. Even making a sharp jab at Town Hall meetings (I had a feeling some of those guys were paid off). Now, Merlin the Magician (a role played by Rowlf, who was actually cast beforehand in The Jim Henson Hour) has to train Kermit to become king, and instructs him on using the magical sword,  And even more crazy antics ensue, with all your favorites and fun little cameos, including Miss Piggy who’s tailor made to play the role of Morgana.

Having been through two fairy tale adaptations already, the side projects to The Muppet Show Comic Book have become quite breezy and fun to read. While Robin Hood had the misfortune of being the first one (and therefore being the test comic), Peter Pan came out much more fluid (in writing and art). King Arthur is just as fluid as Peter Pan was. Robin Hood, long story short, tried to cram in too much legend into 4 smaller issues, leading to lengthy dialogue balloons that detracted from the action. Peter Pan, however, took the barest parts of the story and managed to get everything into those 4 issues, shortening and omitting parts of the story. But it didn’t exactly need them to get their point across, and I hardly even missed the Crocodile (he wouldn’t have worked in their version anyway). 

Now, King Arthur is a legend that has been completely inconstant to begin with, with half the characters added in by different writers (Lancelot came from a French epic for example).  The story combines the Lady of the Lake and the Sword in the Stone, and manages (so far) to take bare bones parts of the story, leaving the writers to adapt the rest of the story as they please.

And I can’t close this without mentioning the art. If Roger Langride is schooled in underground Comix and Amy Mebberson is clearly inspired by Disney, Dave Alvarez is a follower of the old Tex Avery Looney Tunes style. And it works just as well as the other adaptations. I swear, if the Muppets ever got another animated cartoon, this would be the style they’d use. The illustrations looks like they’re moving, and can barely stay on the page. Now, Dave is a veteran of this, and has a bunch of great fan Muppet Strips online somewhere, and he really brings that same visual humor to this one. I’d almost say it’s a shame he’s not doing the rest of the series, but I can’t wait to see the next artist take a crack at is as well.


Be sure to check back on The Muppet Mindset tomorrow for our exclusive interview with Dave Alvarez, artist of Muppet King Arthur #1!












The Muppet Mindset by Ryan Dosier
The Muppet Whatnot Workshop-Only Available at FAO.com
The Muppet Whatnot Workshop-Only Available at FAO.combanner